SELECTION AND APPRAISAL OF DATA
Data curation scholars emphasize that appraisal should begin early in the research lifecycle rather than after data creation. According to Yakel (2007), proactive appraisal helps institutions identify datasets with enduring research, administrative or historical value before they become disorganized or inaccessible. This approach aligns with modern digital curation frameworks which stress continuous management of data from creation to preservation and reuse. Researchers and data curators typically assess datasets based on criteria such as relevance to research objectives, completeness, accuracy, uniqueness, legal requirements, ethical considerations and potential future reuse (Niu, 2014). These criteria help ensure that selected data support transparency and scholarly integrity.
The appraisal process involves evaluating the
quality and reliability of data sources. Poorly documented or inconsistent
datasets may reduce the credibility of research findings and limit
opportunities for secondary analysis. (Higgins, 2008) notes that metadata plays a critical role in
appraisal because it provides contextual information about how data were
collected, processed and interpreted. Well structured metadata improves
discoverability and enables future researchers to understand and reuse datasets
effectively.
In addition, ethical and legal considerations strongly influence the selection and appraisal of data. According to (Harvey, 2008), sensitive information involving human participants, personal identifiers or confidential institutional records requires careful evaluation before preservation or sharing. Data curators must therefore ensure compliance with ethical standards, copyright regulations and data protection laws.
Technological considerations also affect appraisal decisions in digital environments. Wilkinson (2016) notes that data stored in obsolete formats or unsupported software systems may become inaccessible over time reducing their preservation value. Therefore, curators often assess the technical sustainability of datasets including file formats, interoperability and compatibility with repository systems. The FAIR data principles which promote that data are Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable, have become influential guidelines in modern data curation practices (Wilkinson, 2016). Applying these principles during selection and appraisal improves long term sustainability and accessibility of research data.
In conclusion, selection and appraisal of data are essential in data curation because they ensure that important, reliable and reusable datasets are preserved for future access.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3kw9_2lWxM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6s0BpxUlFo
REFERENCES
Harvey, B. R.
(2008). Appraisal and Selection. In Digital Curation Centre.
Higgins, S.
(2008). The International Journal of Digital Curation. 3(1), 134–140.
Niu, J. (2014).
Appraisal and Selection for Digital Curation. International Journal of
Digital Curation, 9, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v9i2.272
Wilkinson, M. D.
(2016). Comment : The FAIR Guiding Principles for scienti fi c data
management and stewardship. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Yakel, E.
(2007). Digital curation. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital
Library Perspectives, 23(4), 335–340. DOI:10.1108/10650750710831466

Power packed
ReplyDeleteWonderful
ReplyDeleteThis is a great work
ReplyDeleteWell done
ReplyDeleteWell done, great work
ReplyDeleteGreat catch on when to start the selection and appraisal processes to determine the value and retention period of resources.
ReplyDeleteThis is nice work
ReplyDelete