DATA CURATION PRESERVATION ISSUES: BUDGETS, COSTS, STAFFING AND SKILLS
As
digital information continues to grow exponentially, data curation and
preservation have become essential functions for libraries, archives, research
institutions and universities. Data
curation refers to the active management and preservation of digital resources
throughout their lifecycle to ensure they remain accessible usable and
meaningful over time (Higgins,
2008).While technological solutions are often
emphasized in discussions of digital preservation, factors such as funding,
staffing and workforce skills frequently determine the success or failure of
preservation activities (Shah
et al., 2021). These challenges are important
because digital preservation is a long-term commitment that requires sustained
investment and institutional support.
High cost of
digital preservation:
Contrary to the common perception that digital storage is inexpensive,
preserving digital materials over time requires substantial and recurring
investments. Costs go beyond storage infrastructure to include software
licensing, hardware replacement, data migration, repository maintenance and
cyber security measures (Shah
et al., 2021). Furthermore, files must be continuously
monitored, refreshed and migrated to newer formats to prevent technological
obsolescence. As a result, institutions often struggle to estimate and secure
long-term funding necessary to sustain preservation programs (Shah
et al., 2021).
Budget
constraints:
Many institutions operate under limited financial resources and must balance
digital preservation against competing priorities such as service delivery,
infrastructure development and research support (Shah
et al., 2021). Libraries and archives
particularly in developing countries frequently face difficulties obtaining
dedicated budgets for digital preservation activities. When funding is
inadequate, institutions may delay technology upgrades, reduce preservation
activities or fail to implement comprehensive preservation strategies, thereby
increasing the risk of data loss and reduced accessibility (Pasqui,
2024).
Staffing
capacity:
Effective data curation requires professionals who posses expertise in digital
preservation, metadata standards, data management, information technology and
records management (Yoon
et al., 2025). However, many institutions
face shortage of qualified staff capable of managing increasingly complex digital
collections. Existing staff are often expected to assume digital curation
responsibilities in addition to their traditional duties creating workload
pressures that can undermine preservation efforts. Without adequate expertise,
institutions risk implementing ineffective preservation practices that
compromise long-term accessibility (Chawinga
& Zinn, 2021; Zareef & Jabeen, 2025b).
Skills and
competencies:
The rapid evolution of digital technologies requires continuous professional
development to keep pace with emerging trends, tools and best practices.
According to Yoon
et al. (2025), digital curation
professionals require a multidisciplinary skill set that combines technical
expertise with knowledge of archival principles, policy development and project
management. However, opportunities for training and capacity building are often
limited particularly in resource-constrained environments. Skills gaps can
result in poor metadata creation, inadequate preservation planning and
ineffective management of digital repositories ultimately reducing the
long-term value of preserved data (Shah
et al., 2021; Zareef & Jabeen, 2025a).
Addressing
these challenges requires a strategic and suistainable approach. Institutions
should develop long-term funding models that recognize digital preservation as
a core organizational responsibility rather than a short-term project.
Investment in workforce development through training, professional education
and mentorship programs can strengthen staff capacity and resilience (Yoon
et al., 2025). Collaborative approaches
including shared repositories and preservation networks may also help reduce
costs and improves access to specialized expertise (Faniel
& Yakel, 2017).
In
conclusion, budgets, costs, staffing and skills represent some of the most
significant barriers to effective data curation. By addressing these
challenges, institutions can enhance their ability to preserve valuable digital
assets and ensure their continued accessibility for future generations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Xx1Ysd6DsA&t=18s
References
Chawinga, W. D., & Zinn, S. (2021). Research Data
Management in Universities : A Comparative Study from the Perspectives of
Librarians and Management Research Data Management in Universities : A
Comparative Study. International Information & Library Review, 53(2),
97–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2020.1793448
Faniel, I. M., & Yakel, E. (2017). Practices Do Not Make
Perfect Disciplinary Data Sharing and Reuse Practices and Their Implications
for Repository Data Curation. In L. R. Johnson (Ed.), Curating Research
Data, Volume 1: Strategies for your Digital Repository (Vol. 1, pp. 103–126).
Association of College and Research Libraries.
Higgins, S. (2008). The International Journal of Digital
Curation. 3(1), 134–140.
Pasqui, V. (2024). Digital curation and long-term digital
preservation in libraries. JLIS.It, 15(1).
https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-567
Shah, U. A., Hussain, M., Saddiqa, M., & Yar, M. S.
(2021). Problems and Challenges in the Preservation of Digital Contents : An
Analytical Study. Library Philosophy and Practice.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5628
Yoon, A., Kim, J., & Donaldson, D. R. (2025). Big data
curation framework : Curation actions and challenges. Journal of Information
Scienc, 51(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221133528
Zareef, M., & Jabeen, M. (2025a). A systematic review of
digital curation services in academic libraries : navigating policies , skills
and challenges. Digital Library Perspectives, July. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-10-2024-0158
Zareef, M., & Jabeen, M. (2025b). Systematic literature
review of digital curation services in academic libraries ( 2001 – 2023 ): A
global perspective. Journal of Information Science, 1–29.
https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515241305348
This is great job and easy to follow
ReplyDeleteExecellent
ReplyDeleteNice job
ReplyDeleteWell structured post and easy to follow.
ReplyDeleteNice work Eddah
ReplyDeleteGood one
ReplyDeleteTechnological maintenance surely catches most institutions unaware of high maintenance costs that they have to cover. Inexpensive costs for storage technology is quite a big trap to many.
ReplyDelete